Rebrand #476
Labels
No labels
breaking change
duplicate
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
scope: card
scope: docs
scope: game
scope: registry
scope: script
scope: tool
scope: universe
tracker
type: bug
type: card request
type: documentation
type: enhancement
type: improvement
type: parity
wontfix
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
LunarTides/Hearthstone.js#476
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The 4.0 update should probably feature a rebrand.
Version
The version system is kinda stupid. This project is nowhere near stable, nor do i really support any prior version. The stable release of the 3.0 update still has bugs that I caught quickly after release, but haven't patched in stable yet.
Therefore, it would be better to have a 0.x.x system for now, to allow for faster updates. (As opposed to the multi-month long updates currently.)
I'll have to see what version this project should end up at after the rebrand.
Name
You may have noticed that I've been avoiding the name of this project, Hearthstone.js, and have been calling it "this project." You may also have noticed that I've called this issue "Rebrand" instead of "Change version format."
As you may have guessed, it's time for Hearthstone.js to get a new name.
Don't get me wrong, I'm quite attached to the name Hearthstone.js due to nostalgia, but it's a bit too bland. Although this project will probably never completely separate from the identity of a Hearthstone clone, and will probably never outshine the original, I'm quite happy with what I've made, and so want to give it the name I feel it deserves, so that it can walk on it's own, outside the shadow of its "inspiration." (Heavy quotes)
I've not quite settled on a name yet, but I have a few ideas in mind.
Effect
The version change won't cause much trouble.
The name change on the other hand, would require sweeping changes to the codebase. I'd also have to change the subdomain away from "hs." But it shouldn't be that bad.